Decentralization Vs. Centralization
Decentralization is a fundamental aspect of delegations: to the
extent that authority is not delegated, it is centralized. Absolute
centralization in one person is conceivable. But it implies no subordinate
managers and therefore no structured organization. Consequently. It can be said
that some decentralization characterizes all organizations. On the outer hand.
There cannot be absolute decentralization, for if managers should delegate all
their authority, their status as managers would cease, their position would be
eliminated, and there would. Again, be no organization. Centralization and decentralization
arc therefore tendencies: they arc qualities like "hot" and
"cold".
Furthermore, centralization often refers to departmental
activities. Service divisions centralize similar or specialized activities in a
single department. But when centralization is discussed as an aspect of
management. It refers to withholding of delegating authority for
decision-making.
Although closely related to delegation of authority.
Decentralization is something more: it reflects a philosophy of organization
and management. It requires careful selection of what decisions to push down
into the organization structure and what to hold at or near the top. Specific
policy-making to guide the decision-making. Selection and training of people.
And adequate controls. A policy of decentralization affects all areas of
management and can be looked upon as an essential element of a managerial
system. It is a fact that, without decentralization, managers cannot use their
discretion to handle the ever-present and ever changing situations they
continually face.
No comments:
Post a Comment